About
All feedback (2,368)
- critpro (25279)- Feedback left by buyer.Past yearVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended.
- taishan_musical (453)- Feedback left by buyer.More than a year agoVerified purchaseGood buyer, prompt payment, valued customer, highly recommended. taishan_musical
- 2011markwizardofoz2011 (2474)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseThank-You for your purchase Hope they do well for you A+++++
- schoolkids_records (4098)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseThanks for your order!
- ewin_sell (37491)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseValuable customer, please buy from us again, Thanks !!
- elisasbargains (15734)- Feedback left by buyer.Past monthVerified purchaseThank you for an easy, pleasant transaction. Excellent buyer. A+
Reviews (22)
Mar 20, 2011
Lowrance won't fix it
I have used my GO2 for several years with great success. The map of the Jourdan River in MS kept me on course and out of alligator swamps. But then it stopped working and would not get a fix on satellites. I called Lowrance for repairs and was told that this unit is "NO LONGER SUPPORTED". If it breaks, use it as a paperweight or throw it away.
I loved the unit so much I bought another one. It has a great map for such a low priced unit.
Apr 01, 2011
Sigma 18-200 f:3.5-6.3 O.S. (Optical Stabilizer)
I do wedding photography and the Sigma 18-200 with stabilizer is the only lens that I need. In wedding photography things happen fast and the zoom range of this lens often saves the day. Keeping one lens on the camera all day prevents dust from entering. The images are sharp, and contrast is very good. There is, however, a slight fall off in image quality at the 200mm setting, but it is still better than most of the competition.
Sure the Nikon is built better, but it is also heavier. It is hard enough to carry a DSLR plus flash and Stroboframe around your neck all day, without adding more weight with a heavier lens. After thousands of photos, my Sigma lens is still tight and as good as new.

Jan 24, 2018
Almost perfect
If this all-in-one produced better photos it would be the perfect printer. It is relatively small for a printer capable of prints up to 11"x17'. It uses 4 ink tanks which seem to last a long time. Text quality is very fast and great quality. Photos could be improved. This is probably due to the printer using 4 tanks of dye inks, without a photo black. The photos are OK but lack that "snap" that I am used to.
Paper is loaded horizontally or in landscape mode. Text is printed very fast which surprised me. Paper larger than letter size is loaded through the back, one sheet at a time. You must be careful or the print may be crooked or tilted on the paper. The paper tray holds paper up to 8.5"x11" and I have not tried to feed 8.5"x14" paper singly through the rear. For the price, it is a good printer for home or small office use, as long as you are not too picky about the photos.
Another negative is that Brother inks and paper are hard to find locally and there seems to be very little choice in photo papers.